Activity

  • Hurley Gustavsen posted an update 3 weeks, 6 days ago

    It is unclear whether the coronary microvascular responses to multiple, mechanistically distinct hyperaemic agents exert similar dilatory responses or share common clinical predictors. 5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine This study therefore sought to characterize the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) response to multiple hyperaemic agents in the human coronary circulation.

    Thermodilution-derived IMR was determined during intravenous adenosine, intracoronary acetylcholine, and intravenous dobutamine in patients with ischemic symptoms and nonobstructive coronary angiograms. A total of 128 patients were studied (44 with adenosine and acetylcholine, and 84 with all agents). Adenosine IMR >25, acetylcholine IMR >31, and dobutamine IMR >29 were used to define elevated responses.

    IMR responses demonstrated weak-to-moderate association (adenosine vs acetylcholine IMR ρ= 0.33; adenosine vs dobutamine IMR ρ= 0.51; acetylcholine vs dobutamine IMR ρ= 0.28; all

    < 0.01). Logistic regression analyses revealed that (1) elevated adengents are only moderately associated, whereas the predictors for agent-specific IMR responses varied, suggesting that multiple pharmacologic agents interrogate different microvascular control mechanisms.

    Despite limitations, platelet transfusion has been used to minimise bleeding risk in patients with thrombocytopaenia. Lusutrombopag is an oral, thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for treatment of thrombocytopaenia associated with chronic liver disease in patients undergoing planned invasive procedures. This

    analysis assessed the magnitude of platelet count change based on the integrated per-protocol population from 2 similar phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

    Adults with chronic liver disease-induced thrombocytopaenia and platelet count <50 (× 10

    /L) received lusutrombopag 3mg or placebo ≤7 days before invasive procedure scheduled 9-14 days after randomisation. Platelet transfusion was required per protocol if the platelet count remained <50 no more than 2 days before the planned invasive procedure.

    analysis included proportion of patients with platelet count ≥50, ≥1.5-fold increase, and a doubling of platelet count; maximum and maximum change inly demonstrated efficacy in raising platelet counts and is approved to treat chronic liver disease patients with low platelet counts in advance of a planned surgery. Physicians need to understand more clearly what to expect in terms of platelet count change when using lusutrombopag; this integrated analysis provides data to help guide its clinical application.

    Patients with low platelet counts caused by chronic liver disease may not receive planned invasive procedures or surgeries because of an increased risk of bleeding. Lusutrombopag has previously demonstrated efficacy in raising platelet counts and is approved to treat chronic liver disease patients with low platelet counts in advance of a planned surgery. Physicians need to understand more clearly what to expect in terms of platelet count change when using lusutrombopag; this integrated analysis provides data to help guide its clinical application.

    The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems and it may have heavily impacted patients with liver cancer (LC). Herein, we evaluated whether the schedule of LC screening or procedures has been interrupted or delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    An international survey evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice and clinical trials from March 2020 to June 2020, as the first phase of a multicentre, international, and observational project. The focus was on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, cared for around the world during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave.

    Ninety-one centres expressed interest to participate and 76 were included in the analysis, from Europe, South America, North America, Asia, and Africa (73.7%, 17.1%, 5.3%, 2.6%, and 1.3% per continent, respectively). Eighty-seven percent of the centres modified their clinical practice 40.8% the diagnostic procedures, 80.9% the that routine care for these patients has been majorly disrupted, which could have a significant impact on outcomes.

    The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems globally. Herein, we assessed the impact of the first wave pandemic on patients with liver cancer and found that routine care for these patients has been majorly disrupted, which could have a significant impact on outcomes.

    Abnormal liver tests are common in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but a possible direct role of the virus in liver injury and its association with short-term outcomes are controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the pattern of abnormal liver tests in patients with SARS-CoV-2 with those of patients infected with influenza, a non-hepatotropic respiratory virus, and their association with worse outcomes during hospitalisation.

    We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1,737 hospitalised patients (865 with influenza and 872 with SARS-CoV-2) in a tertiary medical centre. We defined abnormal liver tests as alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase ≥40IU/ml at any time-point during hospitalisation.

    Abnormal liver tests were mild to moderate in most patients regardless of infection type, but the majority of patients with influenza had a transaminase peak earlier during hospitalisation compared with patients with SARS-CoV-2. Abnormal liver testsein, we compare the pattern of abnormal liver tests and their association with disease severity between 2 major non-hepatotropic respiratory viruses SARS-CoV-2 and influenza. We show that abnormal liver tests are common in both infections, may slightly differ in their kinetics, and are associated with worse outcomes, especially in patients with severe liver test abnormalities. These results strongly suggest that abnormal liver tests in SARS-CoV-2 patients reflect disease severity, rather than a virus-mediated direct liver injury, and should be closely followed in admitted patients.